Observations from the program on chronic mental illness.

Abstract

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) Program on Chronic Mental Illness has come to an end. Launched in December 1986, it was the foundation’s first multisite national venture into mental health care. The program sought to establish improved systems of care for persons with serious and long-term mental disorders in nine major cities across the country. Now, almost six years later, the grant period has ended, and it is time to take stock. The nine demonstration programs are still intact, with more than 250 staff in place at the sites. Throughout the program’s lifetime it received $22.5 million in RWJF grant funds, $9 million in foundation loan funds to stimulate housing development, and 1,200 Section 8 housing certificates, issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). One view of the impact of this program is offered by Howard Goldman and his colleagues, based on a formal evaluation funded by RWJF and a consortium of federal agencies.’ But there is another view of the program’s impact: the subjective impressions of the national program office staff and the staff at the nine demonstration sites. This perspective has been enriched by RWJF’s style of grant management, which is to fund a partnership between the national program office (typically in a university) and the demonstration sites. Instead of awarding the grant and coming back later to assess the results, RWJF requires that each demonstration site develop its program in collaboration with the national program staff. The national office maintains constant contact with the sites to monitor progress and solve immediate problems and carries out numerous site visits, with special conferences among the sites and other direct contact as needed. This management style affords the national program staff an intimate view of the demonstration sites and an opportunity to compare them as they face common situations.