Obscene Activity: Rethinking Agency and Desire in Early Medieval England

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

ABSTRACT The Exeter Book, a tenth-century collection of Old English poetry, contains ninety-odd riddles describing human interactions with objects, abstract concepts, and the natural world. Significant recent criticism has focused on how these riddles attribute agency, movement, or power to the nonhuman entities they describe, thus apparently decentering the human in accordance with twenty-first-century posthuman ethics. Yet this article, focusing on the obscene riddles of the collection, argues that although these poems do indeed attribute agency to nonhuman actors, this attribution does not always elevate these nonhuman actors so much as devalue “agency” as we understand it today. After exploring the pitfalls of reading for agency in Riddle 12 (Ox), I turn to an alternative method of attributing intention used in six of the collection’s other obscene riddles: “willa.” This concept, best translated here as “desire,” is a quality that works—like agency or animacy today—to draw and redraw the lines of the human in these double entendre poems. Using the work of Mel Y. Chen and Eunjung Kim, this article argues that by contextualizing agency and its historical equivalents in our analysis, we are better able to track violent power dynamics at work in early medieval English texts.