Abstract

The child-raising benefit is intended to partially cover expenses related to the child's upbringing. Beneficiaries may include in particular the mother or the father of the child, provided that both parents live together with the child. If the parents are divorced and have alternating custody of the child, the benefit may be claimed and received by the one who actually exercises custody over the child. In the judgement under consideration, the custody of the child was actually exercised by the father. Nevertheless, the benefit was claimed by the mother who, on the basis of an unofficial agreement with the child's father, transferred to his bank account a relevant share of the benefit for the periods during which the child was in the care of the father. This solution is not consistent with a strict interpretation of the applicable provisions. The court accepted it, arguing that it would only be necessary to clarify whether the benefit received was used in accordance with its intended purpose.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.