Abstract

Abstract. Decision tree algorithms, such as random forest, have become a widely adapted method for mapping soil properties in geographic space. However, implementing explicit spatial trends into these algorithms has proven problematic. Using x and y coordinates as covariates gives orthogonal artifacts in the maps, and alternative methods using distances as covariates can be inflexible and difficult to interpret. We propose instead the use of coordinates along several axes tilted at oblique angles to provide an easily interpretable method for obtaining a realistic prediction surface. We test the method on four spatial datasets and compare it to similar methods. The results show that the method provides accuracies better than or on par with the most reliable alternative methods, namely kriging and distance-based covariates. Furthermore, the proposed method is highly flexible, scalable and easily interpretable. This makes it a promising tool for mapping soil properties with complex spatial variation.

Highlights

  • Machine learning has become a frequently applied means for mapping soil properties in geographic space

  • With oblique geographic coordinates (OGCs) in combination with auxiliary data, accuracies generally increased with the number of coordinate rasters

  • We have shown in this study that the use of oblique geographic coordinates (OGCs) is a reliable method for integrating auxiliary data with spatial trends for modeling and mapping soil properties

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Machine learning has become a frequently applied means for mapping soil properties in geographic space. Many researchers have used decision tree algorithms as they are computationally efficient, do not rely on assumptions about the distributions of the input variables, and can use both numeric and categorical data (Quinlan, 1996; Mitchell, 1997; Rokach and Maimon, 2005; Tan et al, 2014). They effectively handle nonlinear relationships and complex interactions (Strobl et al, 2009). Unlike geostatistical methods, such as kriging, the predictions can contain spatial bias

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call