Objective response and disease outcome in 59 patients with stage D 2 prostatic cancer treated with either buserelin or orchiectomy Disease aggressivity and its association with response and outcome

Abstract

A comparative study was done in 59 recently diagnosed Stage D 2 prostatic cancer patients treated with either long-term GnRH-A (Buserelin) (N = 42) or with orchiectomy (N = 17) and followed up for three years. The suppressed limits of plasma testosterone and estradiol levels after eight-week follow-up as well as the objective clinical response and disease outcome were found to be similar with either treatment. Hot flushes and loss of libido were noticed in both groups throughout the follow-up period; however, there were no other side effects. Analysis of Stage D 2 patients based on their time of death enables us to identify non-hormonal variables which, in the form of an aggressiveness score, correlated well with both clinical response and disease outcome. These data confirm that (1) Buserelin is an effective and safe alternative to orchiectomy in advanced prostatic cancer, and (2) in clinical studies a multifactor aggressiveness score is useful for analyzing clinical efficacy data. Prospective application of that score may enable predictability of patient response and influence patient management.