Abstract

Introduction The quality of treatment planning system (TPS) commissioning data largely determines the quality of the derived TPS beam model. Modern treatment techniques require a very high degree of competence from the dosimetrist, as well as the dosimetry equipment used for TPS commissioning. Once derived, the beam model should be verified with a range of tests other than commissioning procedures to test the beam model against linac output. Generally, dosimeters used for TPS beam data collection differ largely from those used for post-modelling verification measurements; therefore their correlation needs to be investigated. Materials and Methods Reference beam profile commissioning data were acquired with a Diamond detector (PTW-60019) for field sizes 2 × 2, 3 × 3 and 5 × 5 cm2 at depths 5 and 10 cm in water. Measurements were repeated with a 2D diode array (SunNuclear Mapcheck2) and compared to reference data. Default array spatial resolution of 1 cm was optimized to 1 mm by manual stepping of the device; therefore only measured (non-interpolated) data was gathered and collated using Excel VBA. A 2D gamma analysis with criteria 1%/1 mm was used for quantitative comparisons. Results Comparison of datasets revealed γ 1 in the open and penumbra regions for all scans evaluated. Mapcheck generally yielded a sharper penumbra (0.5 mm) while the largest differences were seen outside the field with Mapcheck demonstrating a 1.5% larger relative dose. Such small deviations can be attributed to differences in the detector sensitive volumes and dosimeter setup. Further, reducing the amount of steps per array profile by two-thirds (from 10 step increments to 3) did not influence the results significantly. Conclusion Results showed with increased resolution the sensitivity of the array are comparable to a diamond detector for small field profiles. Excellent overall agreement was found between these. However, the dosimetric accomplishment may be weakened by acquisition and processing workload therefore optimization thereof was demonstrated.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.