Abstract
BackgroundThe value of early intervention in psychosis and allocation of public resources has long been debated since outcomes in people with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders have remained suboptimal. Several research programs for early psychosis yielded promising results for team-based, multi-element coordinated specialty care (CSC).MethodsSystematic literature search of PubMed/PsycInfo/Embase/clinicaltrials.gov without language restrictions until 06/06/2017. Random effects meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing CSC versus Treatment as Usual (TAU) in in first episode psychosis or early-phase schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (schizophrenia, psychotic disorder not otherwise specified, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, delusional disorder), calculating standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) for continuous and categorical outcomes as well as prespecified subgroup and meta-regression analyses.Co-primary outcomes were all-cause treatment discontinuation and ≥1 psychiatric hospitalization during the treatment period. Key secondary outcomes were total symptom improvement, functioning, and work or school involvement.ResultsAcross 10 trials (n=2,176; age=27.5 ± 4.6 years; male=62.3%; trial duration=16.2 ± 7.4 (range=9–24) months), CSC outperformed TAU at the end of treatment regarding all meta-analyzable outcomes. This included all-cause discontinuation (studies=10, n=2,173, RR=0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.61–0.80, p<0.001; number-needed-to-treat (NNT)=12.4), ≥1 hospitalization (studies=10, n=2,105, RR=0.74, 95%CI=0.61–0.90, p=0.003; NNT=10.1), total symptom severity (studies=8, n=1,179, SMD=-0.32, 95%CI=-0.47, -0.17, p<0.001), positive symptoms (studies=10, n=1,532, SMD=-0.22, 95%CI=-0.32, -0.13, p<0.001), negative symptoms (studies=10, n=1,432, SMD=-0.28, 95%CI=-0.42, -0.14, p<0.001), general symptoms (studies=8, n=1,118, SMD=-0.30, 95%CI=-0.47, -0.13, p=0.001), depressive symptoms (studies=5, n=874, SMD=-0.19, 95%CI=-0.35, -0.03, p=0.017), functioning (studies=7, n=1,005, SMD=0.21, 95%CI=0.09–0.34, p=0.001), involvement in school/work (studies=6, n=1,743, RR=1.13, 95%CI=1.03–1.24, p=0.012; NNT=17.8), and quality of life (studies=4, n=505, SMD=0.23, 95%CI=0.004–0.456, p=0.046). Superiority of CSC regarding all outcomes was also evident at 6, 9–12, and 18–24 months of treatment (except general symptoms and depression at 18–24 months).DiscussionIn early psychosis, CSC is superior to TAU across all meta-analyzable, highly relevant outcomes with small-to-medium effect sizes. These results support the need for funding and utilization of CSC in patients with early-phase psychosis.
Highlights
The value of early intervention in psychosis and allocation of public resources has long been debated since outcomes in people with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders have remained suboptimal
In early psychosis, coordinated specialty care (CSC) is superior to Treatment as Usual (TAU) across all meta-analyzable, highly relevant outcomes with small-to-medium effect sizes
There is a dearth of information on people with first-episode psychosis who do not access specialized early psychosis intervention (EPI) services
Summary
Individuals with mood and psychotic disorders treated in hospital psychiatric units have high rates of discontinuing treatment following discharge, a time that poses substantial risks of serious and even life threatening adverse outcomes. Hospital provider care transition practices believed to improve transitions include communication with outpatient providers, scheduling timely appointments for outpatient follow-up care, forwarding case summaries to aftercare providers, and involving family or support persons in discharge planning. While these are standards of care, little is known about how often they are adequately delivered and their impact on post-discharge aftercare adherence. The medical records showed evidence of inpatient providers communicating with outpatient providers 64% (n=139) of the time. There was evidence of an outpatient appointment scheduled within seven days of discharge for 81% (n=176) of the sample. A case summary was made available to the aftercare provider
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have