Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the performance of the Supreme Federal Court (Brazil) on environmental rulings, originating from international obligations assumed by Brazil and the posture of the government of Jair Messias Bolsonaro, which oscillates between populism and denialism. The rhetorical strategy of the heads of the federal Executive is not a recent novelty in Brazil, and the latest President of the Republic, following the modus operandi of other counterparts, intensified the use of populism in an attack on the international legal order and its institutions. In its functions, the Brazilian Federal Legislative was held in a mere supporting role, without a clear defense of the internationally binding legal ties to Brazil, or a posture of interpellation to the Executive for the maintenance and enhancement of domestic law in the face of law arising from outside its territory. Thus, the Supreme Federal Court assumed the condition of guarantor of transnational legal claims and international law, as a brake on this negationist populism against International Law, contemplating the prevalence of the protection of Human Rights, Democracy, Environment Law, and the Rule of Law. For the development of this research, the inductive method was used, operationalized by the operational concept techniques, bibliographic research, and jurisprudential analysis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.