Abstract

The research problem addressed in this article is the deliberative rationality of the project that puts an end to the CARF casting vote from the point of view of discourse theory. The work is divided into four parts: (i) the propaedeutic description of doctrinal aspects; (ii) criticisms of the casting vote; (iii) the re-action of specialists to legislative changes; and (iv) criticism of deliberative rationality.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call