Nutrient content of vegetation and soil of four conifer species growing under different site and competing vegetation management conditions

Abstract

In this study we examined the long-term effects of competing vegetation control on the total nutrient content of different ecosystem components of 19-year-old Douglas-fir (DF), western hemlock (WH), western redcedar (WRC), and grand fir (GF) stands growing in Oregon’s central Coast Range (CR) and of DF and WRC growing in Oregon’s Cascade mountain foothills (CF). Nutrient content responses were evaluated under two contrasting vegetation control treatments, including the Control (no herbicide application post-planting), and VM (5 consecutive years of herbicide application post-planting). Both treatments involved a pre-planting herbicide application. The ecosystem components were divided into overstory (planted crop trees), midstory, understory, forest floor, fine roots, and mineral soil. All samples were analyzed for content (mass per unit ground area) of total carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sulfur, boron, copper, iron, manganese, sodium, and zinc. VM effects on total plant derived nutrient masses were more prominent than differences in concentrations. Ca was the only nutrient for which all species showed higher plant derived masses in the VM condition. Plant derived tissue content of C, Cu, P, and B all tended to be higher in VM plots, with the exception of WRC plots at the CR site. This case was an outlier due to the fact that Control plots developed significantly more biomass as a result of high midstory biomass, whereas the VM plots developed relatively little midstory and crop tree biomass. There were few differences in soil nutrients content between species and treatments, and those that were significant were unable to be explained by differences in uptake by plant species. Notably, total soil N of WRC at the CR site was significantly lower for VM plots. This may indicate the potential for VM applied to a slow growing species, such as WRC, to reduce ecosystem retention of N. With the exception of C and N, total soil nutrient reserves were orders of magnitude greater than total plant derived masses. This indicated that there is low probability of an adverse effect of VM on soil nutrient stores.