Abstract

It is essential to determine rockmass mechanical parameters in stability assessment. The structural z is the main factor in this regard, and we know little about the relationship between mechanical parameters and multiple structure planes. In this paper, we have conducted a series of numerical tests to obtain mechanical parameters for a dam foundation in Southwest China. The biaxial numerical test was performed based on the discrete element method. This numerical test considers the spacing, types, dip angles, and size effect. We established a relationship of mechanical parameters between small size lab samples and large size field samples. We forecasted the strength parameters for a spillway slope in Southwest China. The dip angle has a significant effect on the slope strength and stability. In this case, the rockmass fracture stress-dip angle curve forms a U-shaped distribution. The X-shaped double structure plane demonstrates severe strength weakening relative to a single structure plane. As structure plane spacing reaches a certain level, its influence on rockmass strength diminishes. The elementary volume of the rockmass for dam foundation analysis is about 4 m × 4 m × 4 m.

Highlights

  • Conventional rock mechanical tests consider an intact rock, and the influence of multiple structure planes is ignored [1,2,3,4,5]

  • Many other researchers have achieved a significant number of results [7,8,9,10,11]. e most common methods used today for mechanical parameters assessment are engineering analogy, lab and field tests, numerical simulation, and counter-analysis [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]

  • We present a numerical test case for a spillway slope, located at the Jinsha River in Southwest China

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Conventional rock mechanical tests consider an intact rock, and the influence of multiple structure planes is ignored [1,2,3,4,5]. Us it may be concluded that it is a feasible and effective means to study the reasonable selection of rockmass parameters and the influence patterns of all factors on rockmass parameters through the combined application of numerical simulation and analogy tests With the same confining pressure, the fracture stresses under different rockmass sizes change significantly, 3.5 55

Mechanical properties
Single joint
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call