Abstract
The discrete element method (DEM) is becoming widely accepted as an effective method for addressing tectonic problems in granular materials. It is capable of reproducing structures observed in the analog model (AM). However, the previous experiments also pointed to variability among DEM models and AMs in the number of fault zones, their dip angle and spacing, and the evolution of the surface slope of a thrust wedge. The accuracy of the DEM depends on the input parameter values, so the calibration of the discrete element method is very important. Microscopic properties of particles and macroscopic properties of loose quartz sand were calibrated through a series of repose angle and biaxial tests. Furthermore, an AM was constructed to simulate the evolution of the thrust wedge to compare with DEM results. DEM and AM results indicate an encouraging overall agreement in model evolution. Based on a new automated wedge quantification method, DEM results were systematically compared with AM results on the number of fault zones, their dip angle and spacing, the evolution of the surface slope of a thrust wedge, and other parameters. Our study provides a necessary comparison between commonly applied modeling approaches, which is important for more confidently applying these methods to understand real fold and thrust belt systems.
Highlights
Fold and thrust belts are a series of mountainous foothills adjacent to an orogenic belt, which forms due to contractional tectonics
The results of Buiter et al (2016) showed the SDEM, named the stress-based discrete element method, is capable of reproducing structures observed in the analog sandbox experiments without the need for the ad hoc calibration routines normally associated with the conventional DEM
The accuracy of the DEM largely depends on the input parameter values, so the calibration of the discrete element method is very important (Coetzee, 2016; Coetzee, 2017)
Summary
Fold and thrust belts are a series of mountainous foothills adjacent to an orogenic belt, which forms due to contractional tectonics. The experiments pointed to variability among models in the number of shear zones, their dip angle and spacing, and the evolution of the surface slope of thrust wedges. They lacked quantitative comparison between the SDEM and corresponding AM results. In Comparisons With Analog Model and Discrete Element Method, an accurate method for measuring the surface slope, width, and height of the thrust wedge is proposed based on the mesh. The results indicate an encouraging overall agreement in model evolution
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.