Abstract
Idealized geometry is typically used in standards for the fatigue life assessment of welded joints. In the presence of stochastic geometrical variations along the weld, the choice of the idealized geometry is however ambiguous. In the notch stress (NS) method with a fictitious notch radius rref = 1 mm, the FAT 225 curve is derived for welds with relatively good quality in toe profiles. In the NS method with rref = ractual + 1 mm, a lower FAT 200 curve is recommended. Both approaches neglect the stochastic variability in toe radius, toe angle and leg length along the weld. The aim of this paper is two-fold. First, a numerical comparison between both approaches in terms of their predicted fatigue life is performed for a non-load carrying fillet cruciform joints. The results show that the NS method with rref = 1 mm and FAT 225 is substantially more conservative. Second, these methods are enhanced by replacing the deterministic stress concentration factor by a probability distribution computed using Monte Carlo simulation. It is shown that NS with rref = 1 mm and FAT 225 does not predict any substantial influence of the stochastic variability in process parameters since the actual toe radius is not included in the analysis. However, the NS method with rref = ractual + 1 mm and FAT 200 predicts a decrease in fatigue life when uncertainties in geometrical parameters is included. This numerical study paves the way for an experimental validation of the predicted influence of stochastic variability of geometrical parameters based on the stochastic notch stress analysis.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call