Abstract

This study presents a numerical analysis of the tube expansion process by conventional tube-end forming versus single point incremental forming (SPIF) using DEFORM. The work includes the assessment of the strain paths within the principal strain space of these processes with respect to the formability limits as well as their evaluation within the equivalent strain versus stress triaxiality space. The results obtained demonstrated that the mechanics of tube flaring process in conventional and incremental forming are substantially different. This analysis of formability in the light of the accumulated equivalent strain and the average stress triaxiality allowed a better understanding of the differences between both processes in terms of the fracture limit strains.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call