Abstract
This paper investigates different numerical modeling strategies for evaluating temperatures in structures subjected to localized fires. Three simple fire models and two methods to interface computational fluid dynamics models with finite element thermal analyses are reviewed. Based on the field of application of each model, a decision flowchart is proposed to select the fire model and strategy suited to the problem. Validation is conducted against three experiments on steel members subjected to localized fires. Results show that the coupling between computational fluid dynamics and finite element analysis through the adiabatic surface temperature is a versatile method able to capture the member temperature in the different experiments in this study. The use of an automatic transfer interface using a transfer file with gas temperatures and radiant intensities is an efficient alternative when the member is outside the fire area and far enough that it does not significantly influence the fire development. The member should not be present in the FDS model when using the interface method. The simple models tend to yield more conservative predictions compared with the experimental results.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.