Abstract

Abstract In a few selected cases of explosive cyclogenesis, a “coarse-mesh” nine-level isentropic prediction model conserving potential geostrophic vorticity is shown to yield dependable 36-hr forecasts of developing cyclones. Stagnant cyclones in adjacent areas are handled with the same degree of accuracy, indicating that numerical instability in the model is not a likely cause of the spontaneous cyclonic development. Tentative conclusions are drawn about the advantages of isentropic, as opposed to isobaric, objective analysis.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call