Abstract

Improvement on soft clay by the installation of stone column is one of the most popular methods followed worldwide. Different analytical and numerical solutions have already been developed for understanding the load transfer mechanism of soft soil reinforced with stone column. This study investigated a bearing capacity of the gravelly sand column, installed in soft clay bed at 15kpa of undrained shear strength. The column variable of length and diameter ratio at 7, 8 and 9 were evaluated. On top of that, the combination of two diameters in single column was tested and the uniform diameter was used as a control. In the numerical analysis, Mohrcoulomb model was adopted in the idealization of the behaviour of the gravelly sand column and soft clay materials. The results revealed that the optimum design that gave the highest loading capacity of the combination 11=12 of column diameter was the length and diameter ratio of 8.

Highlights

  • There are a numerous amount of methods for ground improvement were developed throughout the world

  • Amongst the wide range of ground improvement methods is stone column, which is often considered as cost-effective and environmentally friendly comparing to other types of stiffening column techniques [1]

  • The bearing capacity was remained constant for the floating stone column at length to diameter ratio (L/D) of 10 [4,5,6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There are a numerous amount of methods for ground improvement were developed throughout the world. Amongst the wide range of ground improvement methods is stone column, which is often considered as cost-effective and environmentally friendly comparing to other types of stiffening column techniques [1]. The stone column technique of ground improvement has been proven to be successful in improving slope stability of both embankments and natural slopes, via increasing ground bearing capacity and accelerating the period of settlement. The stiffening column technique has been adopted the floating stone column, when the soft ground is too deep. The bearing capacity was remained constant for the floating stone column at length to diameter ratio (L/D) of 10 [4,5,6]. The ultimate bearing capacity, settlement, and general stability are the parameters to identify the stone column performance

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call