Abstract
Abstract This paper investigates the origins of sortal numeral classifiers in the Indo-Iranian languages. While these are often assumed to result from contact with non-Indo-European languages, an alternative possibility is that classifiers developed as a response to the rise of optional plural marking. This alternative is in line with the so-called Greenberg-Sanches-Slobin (henceforth GSS) generalization. The GSS generalization holds that the presence of sortal numeral classifiers across languages is negatively correlated with obligatory plural marking on nouns. We assess the extent to which Indo-Iranian classifier development is influenced by loosening of restrictions on plural marking using a sample of 65 languages and a Bayesian phylogenetic model, inferring posterior distributions over evolutionary transition rates between typological states and using these rates to reconstruct the history of classifiers and number marking throughout Indo-Iranian, constrained by historically attested states. We find broad support for a diachronically oriented construal of the GSS generalization, but find no evidence for a strong bias against the synchronic co-occurrence of classifiers and obligatory plural marking. Inspection of the most likely diachronic trajectories in individual lineages in the tree shows a stronger effect of the GSS among Iranian languages than Indo-Aryan languages. Taken as a whole, these findings suggest that the association of classifiers and optional number marking in Indo-Iranian is neither solely the effect of universal mechanisms nor of the contingency of local contact histories.
Highlights
Indo-Iranian languages display considerable diversity in constructions where items are enumerated
4.1 Mutational GSS generalization The mutational GSS generalization predicts that classifiers are gained more frequently in the presence of optional plural marking than in the presence of obligatory plural marking
This value, above our 95% Credible intervals (CIs), indicates substantial support for the GSS generalization in its diachronic form; the development of classifiers in Indo-Iranian languages appears to have been strongly influenced by the presence of optional plural marking
Summary
Indo-Iranian languages display considerable diversity in constructions where items are enumerated Ancient languages such as Sanskrit and Avestan, which possess rich nominal morphology, show a straightforward pattern where head nouns agree in number with numerals and quantifiers; not all contemporary languages consistently mark plural number on semantically plural nouns. An important confound in resolving this debate is the extent to which Indo-Iranian languages are subject to what is known as the Greenberg-Sanches-Slobin (GSS) generalization (Greenberg 1972, Sanches & Slobin 1973). This generalization posits an association between the presence of numeral classifiers in a language with optionality (or even absence) of plural marking. If běn is not preceded by a numeral it has a set of different meanings
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.