Abstract

Background: Coronary artery dissection (CAD) sometimes accompanies unstable hemodynamics and requires mechanical cardiac support. Meanwhile, mechanical cardiac support may influence coronary hemodynamics in CAD. No study has examined the impact of Impella left ventricular (LV) support on CAD.Materials and Methods: CAD was induced in eight Yorkshire pigs by injuring the left anterior descending artery (LAD) using a 0.018-in. stiff guidewire and/or deep engagement of a blunt-cut coronary guiding catheter. After the creation of CAD, hemodynamic parameters, coronary pressure, and flow as well as coronary angiograms were acquired before and after maximum LV support using the Impella CP.Result: CADs with a large flap were successfully created by deep engagement of a blunt-tip guiding catheter with forceful contrast injection. One animal (#8) exhibited thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI)-1 flow, while the others (animals #1–#7) showed TIMI-2/3 flow. In TIMI-2/3 animals, maximal Impella support increased mean coronary pressure (108.4 ± 22.5 to 124.7 ± 28.0 mmHg, P < 0.001) with unchanged mean coronary flow velocity (63.50 ± 28.66 to 48.32 ± 13.30 cm/s, P = 0.17) of the LAD distal to the dissection. The LV end-diastolic pressure (20.6 ± 6.6 vs. 12.0 ± 3.4 mmHg, P = 0.032), LV end-diastolic volume (127 ± 32 vs. 97 ± 26 ml, P = 0.015), stroke volume (68 ± 16 vs. 48 ± 14 ml, P = 0.003), stroke work (5,744 ± 1,866 vs. 4,424 ± 1,650 mmHg·ml, P = 0.003), and heart rate (71.4 ± 6.6 vs. 64.9 ± 9.3/min, P = 0.014) were all significantly reduced by Impella support, indicating effective unloading of the LV. In the TIMI-1 animal (animal #8), maximal Impella support resulted in further delay in angiographic coronary flow and reduced distal coronary pressure (22.9–17.1 mmHg), together with increased false-lumen pressure.Conclusion: Impella support effectively unloaded the LV and maintained the hemodynamics in a novel porcine model of CAD. Coronary pressure distal to the dissection was increased in TIMI-2/3 animals after Impella support but decreased in the animal with initial TIMI-1 flow.

Highlights

  • Coronary artery dissection (CAD) is a rare but challenging condition that can cause hemodynamic compromise

  • Baseline echocardiographic and left ventricular (LV) hemodynamics data before CAD creation were within normal ranges (Table 1)

  • These results indicate that Impella unloads the LV in the presence of left anterior descending (LAD) dissection and decreases ventricular work while augmenting the systemic perfusion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coronary artery dissection (CAD) is a rare but challenging condition that can cause hemodynamic compromise. The majority of CADs are traumatic or iatrogenic in nature, the latter occurring as a sequela of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [1, 2]. Iatrogenic coronary dissection is often associated with subsequent myocardial ischemia and can lead to cardiogenic shock, potentially requiring mechanical circulatory support [1, 2]. SCAD is difficult to treat, as this condition leads to friable coronary arteries, making them susceptible to additional iatrogenic dissection or extension of dissections during coronary angiography and PCI. PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is considered in the presence of ongoing ischemia, left main artery dissection, or hemodynamic instability in SCAD patients [3]. Coronary artery dissection (CAD) sometimes accompanies unstable hemodynamics and requires mechanical cardiac support. No study has examined the impact of Impella left ventricular (LV) support on CAD

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call