Abstract

Ultra-low temperature (ULT) storage of microbial biomass is routinely practiced in biological laboratories. However, there is very little insight regarding the effects of biomass storage at ULT and the structure of the cell envelope, on cell viability. Eventually, these aspects influence bacterial cell lysis which is one of the critical steps for biomolecular extraction, especially protein extraction. Therefore, we studied the effects of ULT-storage (-80°C) on three different bacterial platforms: Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis and the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. By using a propidium iodide assay and a modified MTT assay we determined the impact of ULT storage on cellular viability. Subsequently, the protein extraction efficiency was determined by analyzing the amount of protein released following the storage. The results successfully established that longer the ULT-storage time lower is the cell viability and larger is the protein extraction efficiency. Interestingly, E. coli and B. subtilis exhibited significant reduction in cell viability over Synechocystis 6803. This indicates that the cell membrane structure and composition may play a major role on cell viability in ULT storage. Interestingly, E. coli exhibited concomitant increase in cell lysis efficiency resulting in a 4.5-fold increase (from 109 μg/ml of protein on day 0 to 464 μg/ml of protein on day 2) in the extracted protein titer following ULT storage. Furthermore, our investigations confirmed that the protein function, tested through the extraction of fluorescent proteins from cells stored at ULT, remained unaltered. These results established the plausibility of using ULT storage to improve protein extraction efficiency. Towards this, the impact of shorter ULT storage time was investigated to make the strategy more time efficient to be adopted into protocols. Interestingly, E. coli transformants expressing mCherry yielded 2.7-fold increase (93 μg/mL to 254 μg/mL) after 10 mins, while 4-fold increase (380 μg/mL) after 120 mins of ULT storage in the extracted soluble protein. We thereby substantiate that: (1) the storage time of bacterial cells in -80°C affect cell viability and can alter protein extraction efficiency; and (2) exercising a simple ULT-storage prior to bacterial cell lysis can improve the desired protein yield without impacting its function.

Highlights

  • Microbial genetic engineering has revolutionized the field of biotechnology for improving the production of economically viable inherent metabolite/s, heterologous biomolecules, and value-added chemicals [1,2,3,4]

  • We have demonstrated the correlation of cell viability after Ultra-low temperature (ULT) storage to protein extraction efficiency

  • Cells were grown under their respective optimal culture conditions, the biomass was harvested and frozen at -80 ̊C for defined time periods and the corresponding results were correlated to the cell lysis efficiency

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Microbial genetic engineering has revolutionized the field of biotechnology for improving the production of economically viable inherent metabolite/s, heterologous biomolecules, and value-added chemicals [1,2,3,4]. It is important to investigate the impact of cell composition and the duration of ULT-storage to identify their combined effect on cell lysis efficiency. Employing harsh disruptive techniques can overcome the obstacles posed by complex bacterial envelopes, thereby successfully lysing the bacterial cells. As it is known that freezing cells lead to decrease in cell viability [7, 13], we hypothesize that storing microbial biomass at ULT can provide the added benefit of improving cell lysis efficiency by avoiding harsh treatments. Considering the importance of ULT-storage of microbial biomass in biomolecular studies, we have analyzed the impact of ULT-storage on cell viability of three different microbial species that possess diverse cellular envelope composition and structure. We have demonstrated the correlation of cell viability after ULT storage to protein extraction efficiency

Materials and methods
Results and discussion
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.