Abstract

Several sources of bias are involved at each stage of a quantitative precipitation estimation process because weather radars measure precipitation amounts indirectly. Conventional methods compare the relative uncertainties between different stages of the process but seldom present the total uncertainty. Therefore, the objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to quantify the uncertainty at each stage of the process and in total; (2) to elucidate the ratio of the uncertainty at each stage in terms of the total uncertainty; and (3) to explain the uncertainty propagation process at each stage. This study proposed novel application of three methods (maximum entropy method, uncertainty Delta method, and modified-fractional uncertainty method) to determine the total uncertainty, level of uncertainty increase, and percentage of uncertainty at each stage. Based on data from 18 precipitation events that occurred over the Korean Peninsula, the applicability of the three methods was tested using a radar precipitation estimation process that comprised two quality control algorithms, two precipitation estimation methods, and two post-processing precipitation bias correction methods. Results indicated that the final uncertainty of each method was reduced in comparison with the initial uncertainty, and that the uncertainty was different at each stage depending on the method applied.

Highlights

  • Weather radars provide precipitation estimates with high spatial and temporal resolution over the Korean Peninsula and nearby seas

  • This study proposed novel application of three methods to improve upon the previous approaches by quantifying the uncertainty of radar-based precipitation estimation throughout the entire process, and by assessing the magnitude of the uncertainty propagated at each stage

  • Following the quality control methods (ORPG and fuzzy algorithms) and the post-processing precipitation bias correction methods (G/R ratio and local gauge correction (LGC) methods), the accuracy of the radar-based precipitation estimates was compared with the observed precipitation reported by the Automatic Weather Station (AWS)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Weather radars provide precipitation estimates with high spatial and temporal resolution over the Korean Peninsula and nearby seas. They play an important role in predicting and monitoring severe weather conditions (e.g., typhoons, flash floods, and snowfall classification), several sources of bias are involved in quantitative radar-based precipitation estimates. The miscalibration of radar variables includes errors associated with radar measurement hardware, signal processing, quality control, and the relations (i.e., Z-R, ZDR-R, and KDP-R) between radar-measured and observed precipitation (R). Other related research has considered how to correct bias attributable to the

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call