Abstract

Starting from the recognition that an organizational name may serve as a meaningful representation of both organizational identity and strategy, this paper investigates how the temporal tension between an organizational identity anchored in an illustrious past and an exclusively future oriented strategic vision plays out in the case of an organizational name change. The paper employs a critical discursive analysis perspective in order to investigate how temporal work is discursively conducted outside the boundaries of the focal organization. The findings elucidate the micro-discursive elements and temporal orientations underpinning the legitimation and contestation efforts performed by both internal and external stakeholders in a discursive struggle that played out in the media concerning the organizational name change of a long-lived company.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.