Abstract

In this article, we elaborate on postqualitative methodology by engaging with two questions: What does postqualitative mean? Why is the postqualitative movement important? The engagement with these questions evokes a conversation, which becomes our methodology. The conversation is an assemblage, always multiple and collective. This allows us to acknowledge the messy and hybrid processes of knowledge production, and it forces us to be responsive to moments and movements, while remaining vague and ambivalent. As such, the postqualitative provides us with nothing. Simultaneously, it offers tools to navigate and can turn into anything. Nonetheless, it implies hope and is therefore everything.

Highlights

  • After both mentally and physically learning that the time difference between Stockholm and Phoenix is 7 hr, she was back in bed

  • Greetings! Thank you so much for agreeing to skype into my Global Perspectives on Post Qualitative Inquiry course . . . I pitched the idea of doing a special issue on this topic . . . Per the email below, you would compose a 2500-3500 response to two questions: 1. What does “post-qualitative” mean to you? 2

  • Why do you think the “post-qualitative” movement is so important to the field of qualitative inquiry?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

After both mentally and physically learning that the time difference between Stockholm and Phoenix is 7 hr, she was back in bed. Research conversations, feminist collaboration, writing as method of inquiry, methods of inquiry I got this question after the skype seminar I had in September (see email below), and I was thinking: shouldn’t we do this text together?!

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call