Abstract
The article analyses the origin of two rubrics of Justinian’s Digest: De in diem addictionem (D. 18, 2) and De lege commissoria (D. 18, 3). A hypothesis on the creation of these rubrics and relative titles is envisaged: the Digest compilers would have decided (probably in the final phase of the sampling, in an attempt to bring the structure of the Digest into line with the material available to them) to disaggregate a ‘complex’ title D. 18, 1, already formed, extracting passages from it to form two new titles, which are the subject of the research.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
More From: ERGA-LOGOI - Rivista di storia letteratura diritto e culture dell’antichità
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
