Abstract

This study aims to analyse the pros and cons of imposing penalties or fines in law enforcement regulations for violating health protocols in Indonesia. Some people consider that the norm of the fine sanctions in statutory provisions regulating health protocol violators is unconstitutional, but others say it is constitutional. As a country with the largest Muslim population in the world, a study of the perspective of Islamic law is essential. This article uses a normative legal research methodology using two main approaches: the statutory and conceptual approaches. The results show that fines are found in the criminal law clusters and state administrative law. Penalties in state administrative law in their enforcement do not require intervention from other institutions. Still, they can be carried out directly by government officials whose authority has been determined in the laws and regulations. Meanwhile, from the Islamic perspective, the fine sanctions can be applied, in the context of hifz Al-Insan, in Maslahah Mursalah as part of the maqasid al-Syari’ah. The obligation to obey government regulations is part of a person’s obedience to God’s commands.Contribution: This study’s findings can support the government in enforcing the law to combat the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Indonesia and other countries because, constitutionally, the law is legal. Then, the legality of fines for violators of the COVID-19 health protocol, from an Islamic perspective, does not contradict maqasid al-shari’ah. So, there should be no doubts for Muslims to obey these regulations.

Highlights

  • As part of the countries in the world in general, Indonesia cannot be separated from the influence of the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic

  • It is known as the legality principle, and this principle says that all government actions must be based on the authority that comes from statutory regulations

  • If we look at judicial statistics in Indonesia, fines are the least used type of punishment other than imprisonment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As part of the countries in the world in general, Indonesia cannot be separated from the influence of the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Risma Yuliani’s analysis related to the shari’ah economy shows that the COVID-19 pandemic has reduced halal food production in Indonesia (Yuliani 2020:190–199). Some Muslims weigh the pros and cons regarding the prohibition of gatherings to combat the danger of COVID-19, while they have to go to the mosque to pray five times a day and night. They debate about which should come first between the government’s rules and God’s rules.

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.