Abstract

Nonlinear state estimation is a pre-requisite for advanced process control and fault diagnosis tasks. In literature, various recursive nonlinear filtering techniques have been proposed and used for state estimation of nonlinear systems. Over the last few years, Moving Horizon Estimation (MHE) is increasingly being used for state estimation of nonlinear systems. Moving horizon estimation works with a window of data and hence requires additional online computation compared to recursive nonlinear filters. However, MHE performs both smoothing and filtering and thus has the potential to obtain more accurate state estimates as compared to the recursive filters. Most of the available comparisons of MHE with recursive filters are based on simulation case studies where the true states and parameters, as well as noise processes are exactly known. In this work, we apply MHE to a three-tank experimental setup and compare its performance with various nonlinear filters available in literature such as Extended Kalman Filter (EKF), Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) and Gaussian Sum EKF (GSEKF). We present some of the challenges in experimental implementation of state estimation approaches. These include presence of unknown disturbances, non-whiteness of noise signals as well as lack of accurate measurements. We then discuss the approach followed for obtaining model parameters and noise characterization to make the models amenable for filter implementation. It is found that EKF, GSEKF and UKF perform as well as MHE as far as accuracy is concerned, but require significantly lower computational efforts.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call