Abstract
Knowledge of a direct-drive model with a complex mechanical part is important in the synthesis of control algorithms and in the predictive maintenance of digital twins. The identification of two-mass drive systems with one low mechanical resonance frequency is often described in the literature. This paper presents an identification workflow of a multi-resonant mechanical part in direct drive with up to three high-frequency mechanical resonances. In many methods, the identification of a discrete time (DT) model is applied, and its results are transformed into a continuous-time (CT) representation. The transformation from a DT model to a CT model has limitations due to nonlinear mapping of discrete to continuous frequencies. This problem may be overcome by identification of CT models in the frequency domain. This requires usage of a discrete Fourier transform to obtain frequency response data as complex numbers. The main work presented in this paper is the appropriate fitting of a CT model of a direct-drive mechanical part to complex number datasets. Fitting to frequency response data is problematic due to the attraction of unexcited high frequency ranges, which lead to wrong identification results of multi-mass (high order) drive systems. Firstly, a CT fitting problem is a nonlinear optimization problem, and, secondly, complex numbers may be presented in several representations, which leads to changes in the formulation of the optimization problem. In this paper, several complex number representations are discussed, and their influence on the optimization process by simulation evaluation is presented. One of the best representations is then evaluated using a laboratory setup of direct drive with unknown parameters of three high mechanical resonance frequencies. The mechanical part of the examined direct drive is described by three mechanical resonances and antiresonances, which are characteristic of a four-mass drive system. The main finding is the addition of frequency boundaries in the identification procedure, which are the same as those in the frequency range of the excitation signal. Neither a linear least-square algorithm nor a nonlinear least-square algorithm is suitable for this approach. The usage of nonlinear least-square algorithm with constraints as a fitting algorithm allows one to solve the issue of modeling multi-mass direct-drive systems in the frequency domain. The second finding of this paper is a comparison of different cost functions evaluated to choose the best complex number representation for the identification of multi-mass direct-drive systems.
Highlights
Knowledge of the electromechanical system model is important for many different reasons
The identification of a drive system with one (64 or 100 Hz) and two mechanical resonance frequencies was studied in [14] using pseudo-random binary signal (PRBS) and a continuous-time model, with the cost function calculated as a module of the difference between the sampled frequency response and continuous-time model
Previous research has focused on multi-mass drive systems with high mechanical resonance frequencies in ranges up to 500 Hz
Summary
Knowledge of the electromechanical system model is important for many different reasons. The identification of a drive system with one (64 or 100 Hz) and two mechanical resonance frequencies (around 60 and 100 Hz) was studied in [14] using PRBS and a continuous-time model, with the cost function calculated as a module of the difference between the sampled frequency response and continuous-time model. Previous research has focused on multi-mass drive systems with high mechanical resonance frequencies in ranges up to 500 Hz. The first approach of the author of [15] used only output signal in frequency domains with a custom search algorithm. The identification of a discrete model from sampled time-domain data can be applied by linear programing [13,16]; in this approach, transformation to continuous representation after identification is required, and this method lacks frequency constraints. The presented identification workflow is verified by simulation and a dataset from the laboratory setup
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.