Noninvasive transthoracic doppler flow velocity and invasive thermodilution to assess coronary flow reserve.

Abstract

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) provides prognostication and coronary physiological information, including epicardial coronary stenosis and microvascular function. The relationship between stress transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TDE)-derived coronary flow velocity reserve (CFRS-TDE) and thermodilution-derived coronary flow reserve (CFRthermo) before and after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. This single-center prospective registry study evaluated patients who underwent fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided elective PCI for left anterior descending artery (LAD) lesions with wire-based invasive physiological measurements and pre- and post-PCI stress TDE examinations. A total of 174 LAD lesions from 174 patients were included in the final analysis. A modest correlation was detected between the pre-PCI CFRS-TDE and the pre-PCI CFRthermo (r=0.383, P<0.001). The frequently used CFRS-TDE threshold of 2.0 corresponded to a pre-PCI CFRthermo of 2.18. Pre-PCI CFRS-TDE underestimated pre-PCI CFRthermo [1.89 (1.44-2.31) vs. 2.05 (1.38-2.93), P<0.001]. Both CFRS-TDE and CFRthermo increased significantly post-PCI [pre-PCI CFRS-TDE 1.89 vs. post-PCI CFRS-TDE 2.33, P<0.001; pre-PCI CFRthermo 2.05 (1.38-2.93) vs. post-PCI CFRthermo 2.59 (1.63-3.55), P<0.001]. In contrast, there was no significant relationship between changes in CFRS-TDE and changes in CFRthermo after PCI (r=0.008, P=0.915) or between post-PCI CFRS-TDE and post-PCI CFRthermo (r=0.054, P=0.482). Pre-PCI CFRS-TDE and CFRthermo are modestly correlated, but post-PCI CFRS-TDE and CFRthermo have no correlation. CFRS-TDE and CFRthermo are not interchangeable, particularly post-PCI, suggesting that the two metrics represent different coronary physiologies after PCI.