Abstract

Recent advancements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have enabled clinical imaging of human cortical bone, providing a potentially powerful new means for assessing bone health with molecular-scale sensitivities unavailable to conventional X-ray-based diagnostics. To this end, 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and high-resolution X-ray signals from human cortical bone samples were correlated with mechanical properties of bone. Results showed that 1H NMR signals were better predictors of yield stress, peak stress, and pre-yield toughness than were the X-ray derived signals. These 1H NMR signals can, in principle, be extracted from clinical MRI, thus offering the potential for improved clinical assessment of fracture risk.

Highlights

  • The estimate of areal bone mineral density (BMD) by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) does not fully predict fracture risk: for a given DXA score, there is an unexplained increase in fracture risk with age [1,2], as well as with progression of various disease states, such as diabetes [3]

  • The limitations of DXA related to BMD depending on bone size [4] may be somewhat overcome by quantitative computed tomography imaging, but, any X-ray based diagnostic is only sensitive to the mineral portion of the bone, which accounts for only

  • Clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is based on the 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) signal, cannot directly detect bone mineral but is sensitive to the soft tissue of bone

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A recent study has demonstrated that 1H NMR transverse relaxation time constants (T2) distinguishes proton signals from collagen, collagen-bound water, and pore water [5]. With this technology and the idea that the presence and hydration-state of collagen play a critical role in dissipating energy in bone [6], we hypothesized that 1H NMR can report on the material strength of bone, and we present here compelling experimental observations of 1H NMR, X-ray CT and mechanical tests of cadaveric bone samples which indicate that MRI has the potential to better diagnose fracture risk than DXA

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call