Abstract

Weak levels of acidity impair chemosensory risk assessment by aquatic species which may result in increased predator mortalities in the absence of compensatory avoidance mechanisms. Using replicate populations of wild juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in neutral and acidic streams, we conducted a series of observational studies and experiments to identify differences in behaviours that may compensate for the loss of chemosensory information on predation risk. Comparing the behavioural strategies of fish between neutral and acidic streams may elucidate the influence of environmental degradation on nonconsumptive effects (NCEs) of predation. Salmon in acidic streams are more active during the day than their counterparts in neutral streams, and are more likely to avoid occupying territories offering fewer physical refugia from predators. Captive cross-population transplant experiments indicate that at equal densities, salmon in acidic streams do not demonstrate relative decreases in growth rate as a result of their different behavioural strategies. Instead, altering diel activity patterns to maximize visual information use and occupying relatively safer territories appear sufficient to offset increased predation risk in acidic streams. Additional strategies such as elevated foraging rates during active periods or adopting riskier foraging tactics are necessary to account for the observed similarities in growth rates.

Highlights

  • Predation has long been recognized as an important and dramatic factor influencing population demographics, local persistence, distributions, and behaviours of prey species

  • Territories occupied by wild Atlantic salmon fry demonstrated several statistically significant differences in physical measures compared to unoccupied control sites within each stream class (Figure 1)

  • Fishes living in weakly acidic water are deprived of chemical information on ambient predation risk levels to interference with damage-released alarm cues

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Predation has long been recognized as an important and dramatic factor influencing population demographics, local persistence, distributions, and behaviours of prey species. Many studies have begun differentiating between the lethal (after [1]) and nonlethal [2, 3] effects of predation risk on prey. These different processes have been referred to by several related terms, including direct versus indirect [4, 5], consumptive versus nonconsumptive [6, 7], and densityversus trait-mediated [8,9,10] effects. Nonconsumptive effects (NCEs) resulting from the perceived threat of predation have been referred to with hyperbolisms including “the ecology of fear” [11] and “predator intimidation” [12, 13].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call