Abstract

A pseudo-outbreak of Aspergillus caused by false positive cultures can have a high sanitary impact. We determined the effectiveness (fungal load elimination) of a non-touch disinfection system, vs conventional disinfection methods, to solve steady contamination of culture plates with Aspergillus niger at a clinical microbiology laboratory. Routine cleaning-disinfection (RCD), intensive cleaning-disinfection (ICD), and terminal airborne disinfection (TAD) were employed in stages. Air sampling was carried out before and after each procedure. The effectiveness of TAD on contact surfaces was tested by surface sampling. After RCD, ICD, and TAD, there was a mean decrease of 5.4 (95% CI = 1.8-9.0), 19.2 (95% CI = 12.4-26.0), and 4.4 (95% CI = 2.5-6.3) CFU per tested area, and 46.2%, 21.7%, and 95.5% of contaminated areas became sterile, respectively. There was a mean decrease of 30.6CFU per tested surface (p < 0.0007) and 50% of tested surfaces became sterile. Global effectiveness of RCD, ICD, and TAD was 68.8% (95% CI = 68.5-69.1), 82.2% (95% CI = 82.1-82.3), and 99.0% (95% CI = 98.8-99.2), respectively. The effectiveness was higher with TAD (4.1CFU/cm2 less than with ICD; p = 0.0290). No further contamination has occurred since then. When construction and renovation activities are discarded and RCD and ICD practices are insufficient, non-touch disinfection remove residual dust contamination and avoid recurrence.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call