Abstract
Abstract The well-studied moduli space of complex cubic surfaces has three different, but isomorphic, compact realizations: as a GIT quotient ${\mathcal {M}}^{\operatorname {GIT}}$ , as a Baily–Borel compactification of a ball quotient ${(\mathcal {B}_4/\Gamma )^*}$ , and as a compactified K-moduli space. From all three perspectives, there is a unique boundary point corresponding to non-stable surfaces. From the GIT point of view, to deal with this point, it is natural to consider the Kirwan blowup ${\mathcal {M}}^{\operatorname {K}}\rightarrow {\mathcal {M}}^{\operatorname {GIT}}$ , whereas from the ball quotient point of view, it is natural to consider the toroidal compactification ${\overline {\mathcal {B}_4/\Gamma }}\rightarrow {(\mathcal {B}_4/\Gamma )^*}$ . The spaces ${\mathcal {M}}^{\operatorname {K}}$ and ${\overline {\mathcal {B}_4/\Gamma }}$ have the same cohomology, and it is therefore natural to ask whether they are isomorphic. Here, we show that this is in fact not the case. Indeed, we show the more refined statement that ${\mathcal {M}}^{\operatorname {K}}$ and ${\overline {\mathcal {B}_4/\Gamma }}$ are equivalent in the Grothendieck ring, but not K-equivalent. Along the way, we establish a number of results and techniques for dealing with singularities and canonical classes of Kirwan blowups and toroidal compactifications of ball quotients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.