Abstract
In response to NGOs’ demand that mining must benefit communities living around the mining areas, the Government of Malawi reviewed the 1981 MMA. About six local NGOs actively participated in the processes of reviewing the Act. The review of any law, however, involves bargaining amongst political actors holding different interests and power. Mobilizing the concept of governmentality, this paper investigates how and, in whose interests, NGOs that were involved in the review of the 1981 MMA in Malawi shaped the mining review processes. While grassroots struggles against the extractive industry are not new, increased NGOs’ advocacy action in the sector provides new avenues for understanding current forms and structure of struggles. Employing a qualitative research approach (in-depth interviews, focus group discussion and participant observation), the study findings demonstrate how NGOs’ advocacy action through political processes resulted into NGOs’ bifurcated royalties and subjectivities into hegemonic knowledges and rationalities. Thus, the paper questions the conventional argument on NGO political empowerment agenda for marginalised communities by demonstrating how technocratic processes of policymaking within hegemonic structures produces environmental subjects that (re)construct agendas along the interests of powerful actors.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.