Abstract
CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing technologies have the potential to fast-track large-scale crop breeding programs. However, the rigid cell wall limits the delivery of CRISPR/Cas components into plant cells, decreasing genome editing efficiency. Established methods, such as Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated or biolistic transformation have been used to integrate genetic cassettes containing CRISPR components into the plant genome. Although efficient, these methods pose several problems, including 1) The transformation process requires laborious and time-consuming tissue culture and regeneration steps; 2) many crop species and elite varieties are recalcitrant to transformation; 3) The segregation of transgenes in vegetatively propagated or highly heterozygous crops, such as pineapple, is either difficult or impossible; and 4) The production of a genetically modified first generation can lead to public controversy and onerous government regulations. The development of transgene-free genome editing technologies can address many problems associated with transgenic-based approaches. Transgene-free genome editing have been achieved through the delivery of preassembled CRISPR/Cas ribonucleoproteins, although its application is limited. The use of viral vectors for delivery of CRISPR/Cas components has recently emerged as a powerful alternative but it requires further exploration. In this review, we discuss the different strategies, principles, applications, and future directions of transgene-free genome editing methods.
Highlights
Plant breeding aims to produce improved crop varieties with enhanced agronomic traits and better nutrition qualities for a growing human population
Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated protein (Cas) genome editing tools enable precise and traceable modifications that are no different from naturally occurring genetic variations selected during conventional breeding (Voytas and Gao, 2014; Pacher and Puchta, 2017; Zhang et al, 2018)
Phytoinjectors could potentially be adopted for the injection of Cas mRNA and guide RNA (gRNA), RNPs or nanoparticle-bound genome editing reagents. (E–G) Potential target cell types and organs for transgene-free genome editing. (E) Gene editing in plant zygotes
Summary
Plant breeding aims to produce improved crop varieties with enhanced agronomic traits and better nutrition qualities for a growing human population. CRISPR/Cas genome editing tools enable precise and traceable modifications that are no different from naturally occurring genetic variations selected during conventional breeding (Voytas and Gao, 2014; Pacher and Puchta, 2017; Zhang et al, 2018) Many countries such as the USA, Japan and Australia exclude some or all kinds of genome-edited crops from GMO regulation if they are free of transgenes or foreign DNA (Pacher and Puchta, 2017; Tsuda et al, 2019; Entine et al, 2021). Protocols using Cas ribonucleoproteins or transient gene expression with viral vectors have emerged as promising tools for genome editing, whilst avoiding foreign DNA integration These methods do not involve GM and are collectively named as transgene-free genome editing. We will briefly discuss major advances in transgene-free plant genome editing
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have