Noise reduction profile: A new method for evaluation of noise reduction techniques in CT.

Abstract

PurposeNoise power spectrum (NPS) is a commonly used performance metric to evaluate noise‐reduction techniques (NRT) in imaging systems. The images reconstructed with and without an NRT can be compared via their NPS to better understand the NRT's effects on image noise. However, when comparing NPSs, simple visual assessments or a comparison of NPS peaks or medians are often used. These assessments make it difficult to objectively evaluate the effect of noise reduction across all spatial frequencies. In this work, we propose a new noise reduction profile (NRP) to facilitate a more complete and objective evaluation of NPSs for a range of NRTs used specifically in computed tomography (CT).Methods and materialsThe homogeneous section of the ACR or Catphan phantoms was scanned on different CT scanners equipped with the following NRTs: AIDR3D, AiCE, ASiR, ASiR‐V, TrueFidelity, iDose, SAFIRE, and ADMIRE. The images were then reconstructed with all strengths of each NRT in reference to the baseline filtered back projection (FBP) images. One set of the baseline FBP images was also processed with PixelShine, an NRT based on artificial intelligence. The NPSs of the images before and after noise reduction were calculated in both the xy‐plane and along the z‐direction. The difference in the logarithmic scale between each NPS (baseline FBP and NRT) was then calculated and deemed the NRP. Furthermore, the relationship between the NRP and NPS peak positions was mathematically analyzed.ResultsEach NRT has its own unique NRP. By comparing the NPS and NRP for each NRT, it was found that NRP is related to the peak shift of NPS. Additionally, under the assumption that the NPS has one peak and is differentiable, a relationship was mathematically derived between the slope of the NRP at the peak position of the NPS before noise reduction and the shift of the NPS peak position after noise reduction.ConclusionsA new metric, NRP, was proposed based on NPS to objectively evaluate and compare methods for noise reduction in CT. The NRP can be used to compare the effects of various NRTs on image noise in both the xy‐plane and z‐direction. It also enables unbiased assessment of the detailed noise reduction properties of each NRT over all relevant spatial frequencies.