Abstract
In the hurly-burly of public debate during the past 12 months, which has surrounded the decision to build a third London airport at Maplin, the aircraft noise problem has been used both to prove, and disprove, the necessity of a remotely sited airport. In addition, the government has recently showed increasing displeasure with the excessive claims of the environmentalists in their predictions of the sustained levels of aircraft noise exposure during the next decade.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
