Abstract
An apples-to-apples comparison of transition pre-trade analyses is not straightforward, if indeed possible. Due to fiduciary responsibilities, transition clients are inclined to provide transition managers with only high-level pre-trade portfolio characteristics instead of the actual underlying holdings to avoid information leakage. Providing portfolio characteristics leaves room for different interpretations by transition managers on the exact underlying assets involved in the transition. This issue is a major concern that causes noise in comparing pre-trades. This article presents several suggestions for reducing noise in pre-trade comparison while improving the client’s understanding of pre-trades (and comparisons.) <b>TOPICS:</b>Portfolio construction, portfolio management/multi-asset allocation
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
