Abstract

Simple SummaryMorphological modules are structures that have components which covary strongly, but that in turn are relatively independent of other modules, while morphological integration is understood to mean the coordinated morphological variation of the components of a functional whole. Important traits to describe equine breeds are the profiles of different body regions (alloidism). In this research, it was determined if the division between the cervical, dorsal, and rump profiles has a modular basis as well as a morphological integration. A total of 135 digital photographs were booked, in a lateral view (14 females and 121 geldings; age range: 2–20 years), of adult horses, an equine population typical of the floodplain of Arauca, NE Colombia. From each image, 25 reference points (semi-markers) were obtained at the dorsal level of the neck, back, and croup. The modularity hypothesis of different body profiles based on differentiated regions was tested using the RV coefficient, and a two-block partial least-squares analysis was used to assess the level of morphological integration. The results showed that each alloidic group reflected high integration but low modularity. The absence of the fragmentation of the alloidic assemblages would promote the adaptive capacity of the breed by linking coordinated functional responses to similar selection pressures, for example, field work.The aim of this research was to determine if the division between the cervical, dorsal, and croup profiles (three regions commonly assessed for descriptive profile purposes) has a modular basis as well as a morphological integration. For this, a total of 135 digital photographs were obtained, in a lateral view, of adult horses (14 females and 121 geldings; age range: 2–20 years), of the Araucanian breed, an equine population typical of the flooded savannah of Arauca, NE Colombia. From each image, 25 reference points (semi-landmarks) were obtained at the dorsal level of the neck, back, and croup. The hypothesis of the modularity of different body profiles based on differentiated regions was tested using the RV coefficient, and an analysis of two blocks of partial least-squares allowed the evaluation of the level of morphological integration. The results showed that each alloidic group reflected high integration but low modularity. The covariation between the modules was centered mainly on the withers, the loin, and the croup. For the studied profile blocks, no module can be considered. The absence of the fragmentation of the alloidic sets would promote the adaptive capacity of the breed by linking coordinated functional responses to similar selection pressures, e.g., field work. Although the integration between the neck, back, and croup profiles was proven, their modular covariation was low.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.