Abstract

Optimizing nitrogen fertilizer management can reduce nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. This study tested if split applying enhanced efficiency fertilizers (EEFs) resulted in lower N2O emissions than applying equivalent rates of urea at planting. In semiarid southern Alberta, field trials were conducted during three years (planting to harvest) in rainfed winter wheat crops. Annual fertilizer rates ranged from 146 to 176 kg N ha−1. Fertilizer types were urea, and three EEFs (polymer-coated urea, urea with urease and nitrification inhibitors, and urea with a nitrification inhibitor). Each fertilizer type was applied three ways: 100% banded at planting, split applied 30% banded at planting and 70% broadcast in late fall, and split applied 30% banded at planting and 70% broadcast at Feekes growth stage 4 (GS4, post-tiller formation, wheat entering the greening up phase in the early spring). Nitrous oxide was measured using static chambers between sub-weekly and monthly from planting to harvest. Over three years, cumulative N2O emissions ranged from 0.16 to 1.32 kg N ha−1. This was equivalent to emissions factors between 0.009 and 0.688%. Cumulative N2O emissions and emissions factors did not differ between fertilizer types, but they were lower when fertilizer was split applied at GS4 compared to in late fall (P ≤ 0.10). Our study suggests that EEFs do not reduce N2O emissions from rainfed winter wheat crops, but a well-timed split application with a majority of fertilizer applied after winter can minimize N2O emissions.

Highlights

  • Optimizing nitrogen (N) fertilization by aiming to match N supply from fertilizer with N crop demand can reduce excess available soil N, and when this is achieved, soil N2O production may be minimized

  • Our study suggests that efficiency fertilizers (EEFs) do not reduce N2O emissions from rainfed winter wheat crops, but a well-timed split application with a majority of fertilizer applied after winter can minimize N2O emissions

  • Types of EEFs include slow-release fertilizers that physically encapsulate urea allowing fertilizer to gradually diffuse into the soil, and fertilizers containing chemical urease inhibitors (UI) and nitrification inhibitors (NI) which slow the conversion of urea to NH4?, and NH4? to NO3, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Optimizing nitrogen (N) fertilization by aiming to match N supply from fertilizer with N crop demand can reduce excess available soil N, and when this is achieved, soil N2O production may be minimized. Enhanced efficiency fertilizers can prolong N as ammonium (NH4?), which can help reduce nitrate (NO3-) accumulation in soil thereby preventing N transformations to gaseous N forms like N2O (Akiyama et al 2010; Trenkel 2010). A second strategy that may help optimize N fertilization is split applying fertilizer at different times throughout a crop cycle rather than applying once at planting. This strategy attempts to time fertilizer application with accelerated plant N demand. This can improve crop N use efficiency thereby minimizing available N accumulation in soil. Since neither split application nor EEFs directly inhibits N2O production, they are not universal prescriptions for mitigating fertilizer-induced N2O emissions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call