Abstract

The niacin content of cereal raw materials reported in food-composition databases often differs considerably. One major reason for this discrepancy is the analytical method used for its measurement is that a significant part of the niacin in cereals exists in bound form. In this study, we compared the niacin content of some representative cereal raw materials analysed with a sensitive and validated ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–fluorescence method against the values found in five national food-composition databases. We used established extraction methods that are assumed to liberate niacin available for absorption (acid hydrolysis mimicking human digestion) or total niacin (strong acid–alkaline hydrolysis). The niacin content (mg/100 g dry weight) obtained with acid hydrolysis ranged from a low level in corn flour (0.26), white wheat flour (0.45) and oat flakes (0.48), to a higher level in wholegrain flours (rye: 0.79, barley: 0.99, wheat: 0.88), wheat bran (2.7) and wheat germ (2.7). The niacin content with the acid–alkaline hydrolysis, however, was 1.9–11-fold the value measured after extraction with acid hydrolysis. In general, the niacin content found in the databases is closer to the results obtained after the acid–alkaline extraction, suggesting that the niacin values reported in the databases may not reflect actual bioaccessible niacin but total niacin.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call