Abstract

BackgroundAkebiae Caulis (Mu Tong) is commonly misused by Aristolochiae Manshuriensis Caulis (Guan Mutong) and Clematidis Armandii Caulis (Chuan Mutong), which are nephrotoxic and carcinogenic. However, in the Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China (2015 Edition), the method for determining Akebiae Caulis remains undefined.MethodsWe used DNA barcode-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) combined with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to detect Akebiae Caulis in Longdan Xiegan Wan (LDXGW) for the first time. Compared with chromatographic studies, NGS enables better evaluation of the ingredient components of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) preparations. The feasibility of qPCR using species-specific primers to determine the authenticity of species has been validated. In this study, the constituents of Akebiae Caulis in LDXGW from three different manufacturers were scanned by NGS. The independently developed qPCR detection primers of Akebiae Caulis, Aristolochiae Manshuriensis Caulis, and Clematidis Armandii Caulis were specifically used to analyze the LDXGW mentioned above.ResultsThe results showed that qPCR detected Clematidis Armandii Caulis in all commercial samples. Meanwhile, NGS detected the counterfeit species Clematis peterae (Tie-Xian Lian) in all samples. We found that qPCR shows a difference in detecting Akebiae Caulis, but it was not able to identify the unknown additives and adulterants for the primer pairs of Clematidis Armandii Caulis.ConclusionsHence, it is sensitive and rapid, qPCR is not suitable for detection alone. The NGS approaches offer important novel insights that complement the qPCR method. The combination of NGS and qPCR will be a powerful complement to traditional identification methods of TCM substances.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call