Abstract

AbstractThere is a renewed focus on the design of infrastructure resilient to extreme hydrometeorological events. While precipitation‐based intensity‐duration‐frequency (IDF) curves are commonly used as part of infrastructure design, a large percentage of peak runoff events in snow‐dominated regions are caused by snowmelt, particularly during rain‐on‐snow (ROS) events. In these regions, precipitation‐based IDF curves may lead to substantial overestimation/underestimation of design basis events and subsequent overdesign/underdesign of infrastructure. To overcome this deficiency, we proposed next‐generation IDF (NG‐IDF) curves, which characterize the actual water reaching the land surface. We compared NG‐IDF curves to standard precipitation‐based IDF curves for estimates of extreme events at 376 Snowpack Telemetry (SNOTEL) stations across the western United States that each had at least 30 years of high‐quality records. We found standard precipitation‐based IDF curves at 45% of the stations were subject to underdesign, many with significant underestimation of 100 year extreme events, for which the precipitation‐based IDF curves can underestimate water potentially available for runoff by as much as 125% due to snowmelt and ROS events. The regions with the greatest potential for underdesign were in the Pacific Northwest, the Sierra Nevada Mountains, and the Middle and Southern Rockies. We also found the potential for overdesign at 20% of the stations, primarily in the Middle Rockies and Arizona mountains. These results demonstrate the need to consider snow processes in the development of IDF curves, and they suggest use of the more robust NG‐IDF curves for hydrologic design in snow‐dominated environments.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call