New York Politics and Government: Competition and Compassion

Abstract

Two values often at odds with each other-competition and compassion-dominate New York's political culture. Since eighteenth century New York has been known for its economic leadership and entrepreneurial opportunities. Its nickname, the Empire State, reflects state's continuing role as a national and international center of industry and commerce. Yet New York's political culture, as Daniel J. Elazar has noted, is paradoxically both individualistic and moralistic. Compassion is extended not only toward those unable to compete in marketplace but also toward numerous interest groups and institutions-labor, business, nonprofit agencies-that depend on state's largesse for their own well-being. This distinctive political blend can produce inconsistent yet complementary public policies, such as providing tax incentives for economic development alongside liberal Medicaid benefits. In this excellent overview of New York politics, five distinguished scholars explore state's paradoxical political culture, examining its local, regional, and national components through year Sarah F. Liebschutz is Distinguished Service Professor in Department of Political Science at State University of New York College at Brockport. She is author of Bargaining under Federalism: Contemporary New York. Robert W. Bailey is on graduate faculty in public policy and administration at Rutgers University. Jeffrey M. Stonecash is a professor in Department of Political Science at Syracuse University. Jane Shapiro Zacek is director of Office of Grant Support and an adjunct professor of political science at Union College in Schenectady, New York. Joseph F. Zimmerman is a professor of political science in Graduate School of Public Affairs, State University of New York at Albany.