Abstract

Abstract. The Budyko hypothesis (BH) is an effective approach to investigating long-term water balance at large basin scale under steady state. The assumption of steady state prevents applications of the BH to basins, which is unclosed, or with significant variations in root zone water storage, i.e., under unsteady state, such as in extremely arid regions. In this study, we choose the Heihe River basin (HRB) in China, an extremely arid inland basin, as the study area. We firstly use a calibrated and then validated monthly water balance model, i.e., the abcd model, to quantitatively determine annual and monthly variations of water balance for the sub-basins and the whole catchment of the HRB, and find that the roles of root zone water storage change and that of inflow from upper sub-basins in monthly water balance are significant. With the recognition of the inflow water from other regions and the root zone water storage change as additional possible water sources to evapotranspiration in unclosed basins, we further define the equivalent precipitation (Pe) to include local precipitation, inflow water and root zone water storage change as the water supply in the Budyko framework. With the newly defined water supply, the Budyko curve can successfully describe the relationship between the evapotranspiration ratio and the aridity index at both annual and monthly timescales, whilst it fails when only the local precipitation being considered. Adding to that, we develop a new Fu-type Budyko equation with two non-dimensional parameters (ω and λ) based on the deviation of Fu's equation. Over the annual timescale, the new Fu-type Budyko equation developed here has more or less identical performance to Fu's original equation for the sub-basins and the whole catchment. However, over the monthly timescale, due to large seasonality of root zone water storage and inflow water, the new Fu-type Budyko equation generally performs better than Fu's original equation. The new Fu-type Budyko equation (ω and λ) developed here enables one to apply the BH to interpret regional water balance over extremely dry environments under unsteady state (e.g., unclosed basins or sub-annual timescales).

Highlights

  • The Budyko hypothesis was postulated by a Russian climatologist, Mikhail Ivanovich Budyko, to analyze regional differences in long-term annual water and energy balance (Budyko, 1948)

  • Because this study focuses on the application of the Budyko hypothesis (BH) at the annual and monthly timescales, the annual and monthly water balance analysis is very critical to understanding the role of water storage and water source change in the BH

  • That is important for extremely arid environments, especially in China, where water systems are typically unclosed with intense human inference and irrigation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Budyko hypothesis (hereafter BH) was postulated by a Russian climatologist, Mikhail Ivanovich Budyko, to analyze regional differences in long-term annual water and energy balance (Budyko, 1948). The BH’s mean annual water balance is described by the evapotranspiration ratio and the climate aridity index. The BH becomes an effective approach to investigating the influence of climate change on mean annual runoff and evapotranspiration (Donohue et al, 2011; Xiong et al, 2014). Some empirical equations without parameters were proposed by Schreiber (1904), Ol’dekop (1911), Budyko (1948) and Pike (1964) (see Table 1). These equations explicitly include climate variations (radiation, precipitation, evapotranspiration and air temperature) and do not deal with recently recognized important catchment properties, such as characteristics of groundwater system, vadose zone properties, vegetation.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call