Abstract
ObjectivesThe National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence and The Royal College of Physicians recommend transferring thrombolysed patients with stroke to a hyperacute stroke unit (HASU) within 4 h from hospital arrival (TArrival-HASU), but there is paucity of evidence to support this cut-off. We assessed if a shorter interval within this target threshold conferred a significant improvement in patient mortality.DesignWe conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme.SettingFour major UK hyperacute stroke centres between 2014 and 2016.ParticipantsA total of 183 men (median age = 75 years, IQR = 66–83) and 169 women (median age = 81 years, IQR = 72.5–88) admitted with acute ischaemic stroke.Main outcome measuresWe evaluated TArrival-HASU in relation to inpatient mortality, adjusted for age, sex, co-morbidities, stroke severity, time between procedures, time and day on arrival.ResultsThere were 51 (14.5%) inpatient deaths. On ROC analysis, the AUC (area under the curve) was 61.1% (52.9–69.4%, p = 0.01) and the cut-off of TArrival-HASU where sensitivity equalled specificity was 2 h/15 min (intermediate range = 30 min to 3 h/15 min) for predicting mortality. On logistic regression, compared with the fastest TArrival-HASU group within 2 h/15 min, the slowest TArrival-HASU group beyond upper limit of intermediate range (≥ 3 h/15 min) had an increased risk of mortality: 5.6% vs. 19.6%, adjusted OR = 5.6 (95%CI:1.5–20.6, p = 0.010).ConclusionsWe propose three new alarm time zones (A1, A2 and A3) to improve stroke survival: “A1 Zone” (TArrival-HASU < 2 h/15 min) indicates that a desirable target, “A2 Zone” (TArrival-HASU = 2 h/15 min to 3 h/15 min), indicates increasing risk and should not delay any further, and “A3 Zone” (TArrival-HASU ≥ 3 h/15 min) indicates high risk and should be avoided.
Highlights
Thrombolysis is an effective treatment for acute ischaemic stroke [1] and is widely performed in hyperacute stroke units (HASUs) [2, 3]
We initially performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine (1) the association of TArrival-HASU with mortality as indicated by area under the curve (AUC) and (2) the cut-offs of TArrival-HASU (d0) where sensitivity equals specificity for identifying mortality using the two-graph ROC plot technique [11, 12]; d0 was identified by interpolating from the intersection where sensitivity equals specificity (θ0) and limits of intermediate range (IR) from the point where sensitivity and specificity equal 95%
We conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis to estimate the risk of inpatient mortality from slower TArrival-HASU compared with the referent group of hyper-fast TArrival-HASU within d0
Summary
Thrombolysis is an effective treatment for acute ischaemic stroke [1] and is widely performed in hyperacute stroke units (HASUs) [2, 3]. Excellence (NICE) [6] and Royal College of Physicians (RCP) recommend patients presenting with an acute stroke to be transferred to a HASU within 4 h from hospital arrival (TArrival-HASU) [7]. This time window covers the time taken from the point at which the patient arrives hospital to brain imaging, to intravenous thrombolysis, and followed by the transfer to HASU; TArrival-HASU partly depends on the speed at which the patient receives brain imaging and thrombolysis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.