New Combined Metric for Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment

Abstract

In recent years, many new metrics highly correlated with the Mean Opinion Score (MOS) have been proposed for assessing image quality through Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment (FR-IQA) methods, such as MDSI, HPSI, and GMSD. Eight of these selected metrics, which compare reference and distorted images in a symmetrical manner, are briefly described in this article, and their performance is evaluated using correlation criteria (PLCC, SROCC, and KROCC), as well as RMSE. The aim of this paper is to develop a new, efficient quality index based on a combination of several high-performance metrics already utilized in the field of Image Quality Assessment (IQA). The study was conducted on four benchmark image databases (TID2008, TID2013, KADID-10k, and PIPAL) and identified the three best-performing metrics for each database. The paper introduces a New Combined Metric (NCM), which is a weighted sum of three component metrics, and demonstrates its superiority over each of its component metrics across all the examined databases. An optimization method for determining the weights of the NCM is also presented. Additionally, an alternative version of the combined metric, based on the fastest metrics and employing symmetric calculations for pairs of compared images, is discussed. This version also demonstrates strong performance.