Abstract

BackgroundUrban mosquitoes in temperate regions may represent a high nuisance and are associated with the risk of arbovirus transmission. Common practices to reduce this burden, at least in Italian highly infested urban areas, imply calendar-based larvicide treatments of street catch basins – which represent the main non-removable urban breeding site – and/or insecticide ground spraying. The planning of these interventions, as well as the evaluation of their effectiveness, rarely benefit of adequate monitoring of the mosquito abundance and dynamics. We propose the use of adhesive traps to monitor Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens adults and to evaluate the efficacy of insecticide-based control strategies.MethodsWe designed two novel types of adhesive traps to collect adult mosquitoes visiting and/or emerging from catch basins. The Mosquito Emerging Trap (MET) was exploited to assess the efficacy of larvicide treatments. The Catch Basin Trap (CBT) was exploited together with the Sticky Trap (ST, commonly used to collect ovipositing/resting females) to monitor adults abundance in the campus of the University of Rome “Sapienza” - where catch basins were treated with Insect Growth Regulators (IGR) bi-monthly and Low-Volume insecticide spraying were carried out before sunset - and in a nearby control area.ResultsResults obtained by MET showed that, although all monitored diflubenzuron-treated catch basins were repeatedly visited by Ae. albopictus and Cx. pipiens, adult emergence was inhibited in most basins. Results obtained by ST and CBT showed a significant lower adult abundance in the treated area than in the untreated one after the second adulticide spraying, which was carried out during the major phase of Ae. albopictus population expansion in Rome. Spatial heterogeneities in the effect of the treatments were also revealed.ConclusionsThe results support the potential of the three adhesive traps tested in passively monitoring urban mosquito adult abundance and seasonal dynamics and in assessing the efficacy of control measures. ST showed higher specificity for Ae. albopictus and CBT for Cx. pipiens. The results also provide a preliminary indication on the effectiveness of common mosquito control strategies carried out against urban mosquito in European urban areas.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13071-015-0734-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Urban mosquitoes in temperate regions may represent a high nuisance and are associated with the risk of arbovirus transmission

  • Results showed that Sticky Traps (ST) and Catch Basin Trap (CBT) are effective tools for assessing abundance and population dynamics of adult Ae. albopictus in an area where catch basins were treated by Insect Growth Regulators (IGR)-analogs and two insecticide Low Volume sprayings were carried out before sunsets

  • During the testing in Rome, we found ST to be much more efficient than CBT for monitoring the impact of control measures on Ae. albopictus, while the opposite was true for Cx. pipiens

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urban mosquitoes in temperate regions may represent a high nuisance and are associated with the risk of arbovirus transmission. Common practices to reduce this burden, at least in Italian highly infested urban areas, imply calendar-based larvicide treatments of street catch basins – which represent the main non-removable urban breeding site – and/or insecticide ground spraying. The planning of these interventions, as well as the evaluation of their effectiveness, rarely benefit of adequate monitoring of the mosquito abundance and dynamics. Main control measures usually involve treatments of catch-basins (considered as the main non-removable urban larval sites for Ae. albopictus and Culex pipiens [21,22,23]) with Insect-Growth-Regulators (IGR, which interfere with larval development and inhibit adult emergence) and spraying of pyrethroid and/or pyrethrumbased adulticides by truck-mounted cannon spray atomizers or portable thermal foggers

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.