Neurophysiological Subtypes of Depressive Disorders

Abstract

Background: the clinical polymorphism of depressive disorders, together with the available data on the different responses of patients to treatment, motivate modern neuroscience to search for models that can explain such heterogeneity.Objective: to identify neurophysiological subtypes of depressive disorders.Patients and methods: 189 patients with moderate depression in the structure of a depressive episode (n = 42), recurrent depressive (n = 102) and bipolar affective disorders (n = 45); 56 healthy subjects. Clinical-psychopathological, psychometric, neurophysiological and statistical research methods were used in the work.The results: with the help of coherent EEG analysis, it is possible to identify at least 6 subtypes of the disorder, which characterize various branches of the pathogenesis of affective pathology, which go beyond the currently accepted nomenclature. The selected subtypes were determined by the profi les of dysfunctional interaction of various cortical zones in the alpha, beta and gamma ranges of the EEG. Subtype 1 was characterized by a decrease relative to the norm of imaginary alpha-coherence between the right parietal and left central, right parietal and left anterior temporal, as well as the right parietal and right anterior temporal EEG leads (P4-C3, P4-F7, P4-F8) and explained part of depressions, in the pathogenesis of which the leading role was played by violations of the promotion of positive and suppression of negative affect. Subtype 2 — an increase in beta-2-imaginary-coherence between the frontal leads of the left and right hemispheres, between the left frontal and right central cortex (F3-F4; F3-C4) and its decrease between the central cortical zones (C4-C3), in clinical terms this subtype was characterized by a persistent hedonic response and was associated with the clinical picture of atypical depression. Subtype 3 — an increase in imaginary alpha-coherence between the frontal (F4-F3) and its decrease between the central leads of the left and right hemisphere (C4-C3), correlated with the severity of depressive rumination. Subtype 4 — a decrease in imaginary alpha-coherence between the anterior temporal and frontal, as well as the anterior temporal and central cortex of the right hemisphere (F8-F4 and F8-C4), explained part of the depressions that developed against the background of avoidance personality disorder. Subtype 5 — a decrease in imaginary gamma coherence between the frontal and parietal, as well as the central and occipital cortical zones of the left hemisphere (F3-P3 and C3-O1), was associated with an outwardly oriented utilitarian style of thinking (alexithymia). Subtype 6 — a decrease in imaginary beta-1 coherence between the left central and right anterior temporal cortex (C3-F8), explained part of the depression with phobic and hypochondriacal disorders in the structure of recurrent depressive disorder. Such a clinical and biological typology seems new and promising in terms of searching for specifi c neurophysiological disorders in different types of depression and, accordingly, reaching differentiated therapeutic recommendations.