Abstract

The article reflects the history of the formation and development of the term Neuroethics in modern scientific opinion. Relevance: at the present stage of development of scientific thought, neurosciences acquire relevance and take their acting place among others. Yes, deep research into neuroscience issues has not spared philology either. Under the influence of modern research, issues of such scientific disciplines as Affective Neurobiology, Computational, Neurochemistry, Neurophysiology are especially relevant and illuminated in a new way. Neuro engineering, Neuroanatomy, Neuroetology, Neuroimmunology, Neuroinformatics, Paleoneurobiology, neuroeconomics, Cognitive science, Neurolinguistics, Social Neurobiology, Cognitive Neurobiology, Cultural Neuropsychology, Neuroethics. Cognitive Science, Cognitive Science, Neurolinguistics, Social Neurobiology, Cognitive Neuropsychology, Social Cognitive Neurobiology, Neuropsychologists. More and more they delve into the processes of thinking, thought of correction, thought of suggestion of a person, and, therefore, the issue of ethics and the limits of this intervention is relevant. The aim of the article is to raise the question of the relevance of Neuroethical problems for linguistic disciplines. The object of the article is the study of issues of Neuroethics, and the subject is the possibility of applying the basic principles of Neuroethics to modern linguistic disciplines.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call