Abstract

Societal norms exert a powerful influence on our decisions. Behaviours motivated by norms, however, do not always concur with the responses mandated by decision relevant information potentially generating a conflict. To probe the interplay between normative and informational influences, we examined how prosocial norms impact on perceptual decisions subjects made in the context of a simultaneous presentation of social information. Participants displayed a bias in their perceptual decisions towards that mandated by social information. However, normative prescriptions modulated this bias bi-directionally depending on whether norms mandated a decision in accord or contrary to the contextual social information. At a neural level, the addition of a norms increased activity in prefrontal cortex and modulated functional connectivity between prefrontal and parietal areas. The bi-directional effect of our norms was captured by differential activations when participants decided against the social information. When norms indicated a decision in line with social information, non-compliance modulated lateral prefrontal cortex activity. By contrast, when norms mandated a decision against social information norm compliance increased activity in the anterior cingulate cortex. Hence, social norms changed the balance between a reliance on perceptual and social information by modulating brain activity in regions associated with response inhibition and conflict monitoring.

Highlights

  • Societal norms exert a powerful influence on our decisions

  • We investigated the interaction between normative and informational influences on a behavioural and at a neural level using functional magnetic resonance imaging

  • Testing for the effect of this interaction, we found that a region in right angular gyrus, extending into supramarginal gyrus showed enhanced functional connectivity with dorsomedial prefrontal cortex under social norms compared to the condition without norms (NONE) (Fig. 4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Behaviours motivated by norms, do not always concur with the responses mandated by decision relevant information potentially generating a conflict. Social norms changed the balance between a reliance on perceptual and social information by modulating brain activity in regions associated with response inhibition and conflict monitoring. Informational and normative influences serve distinct goals. We probe an interplay between informational and normative influences by exposing participants to optimality and compliance goals that can either be in accord or conflict. We introduce two norms that prompt subjects to decide either with or against a majority decision (i.e. social information). Both norms serve the same prosocial compliance goal, namely the collection of bonus points for the other two players. To embed player’s decisions in a real social context, we openly declared how many bonus points each player collected for the others at the end of the experiment (which was known to players beforehand)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.